Publication Date: January 2018
Research and Editorial Team: Peter Berglez, Amanda Gearing
The Panama and Paradise Papers: The Rise of a Global Fourth Estate

The purpose of this article is to improve the understanding of the political, professional, and scholarly implications of investigative work by theorising the emergence and role of the ICIJ. There is a gap between academic theories about emerging forms of journalism, such as collaborative journalism, and existing examples of such journalism. This article aims to connect the work of the ICIJ with relevant theories in the field of media sociology and journalism studies.

The paper states that the existence of the ICIJ presupposes a particular kind of practice among editors and journalists that is more globally oriented than traditional foreign correspondence. To better understand the journalistic practice of the ICIJ, the focus should be on the concept of global network journalism as a potential synthesis of the concepts of global journalism and network journalism.

Regarding the political and democratic relevance of the work of the ICIJ, the article emphasises the need for theorising how the practice of global network journalism may pave the way for the media’s function to keep power accountable. Thus, it proposes to view ICIJ as an extension of the fourth estate into a global fourth estate, while traditional investigative journalism has been strongly connected to a fourth estate and to journalism’s critical examination of state affairs.
According to the authors, the activities of the ICIJ in recent years show that traditional journalism is becoming a more dominant actor, though still assisted by hacktivists and other activists outside the mainstream media establishment.  

As journalism’s natural and necessary response to the development of a more networked social reality, ICIJ’s practices are defined as: the transformation of networked big data into publicly accessible media content in a global context; the adaptation to as well as the development of methods for secure use of networked information and digital technology; and the dynamic development of new networked forms of collaborative work.

In the article, a potential weakness of the ICIJ is identified in its predominant traditional and often influential media houses and companies rather than a dynamic combination of professional and amateur actors. However, the paper suggests that the pressure on media companies and professional journalism to change for the better does not necessarily lead to creative synergies and hybridisation of the professional-amateur divide. As important as global network reality may be, the domestic dimension is still essential to engage domestic audiences.

From a political perspective, the ICIJ and its generation of global network journalism potentially paves the way for a globalised version of the fourth estate. The authors view the global fourth estate not as a historical break with, but as an extension of, the tasks associated with the fourth estate in professional journalism.

Tags: Investigative_journalism Whistleblowing Professional_journalism Media_freedom

The content of this article can be used according to the terms of Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) . To do so use the the wording "this article was originally published on the Resource Centre on Media Freedom in Europe" including a direct active link to the original article page.